πͺ The zero-knowledge case for blockchain
AI Summary
Byron Gilliam reviews 'Zero-Knowledge, Infinite Trust,' a new book by Eli Ben-Sasson and Nathan Jeffay that makes the case for blockchain as inevitable societal infrastructure. Ben-Sasson, co-inventor of Zcash and zero-knowledge proof pioneer, argues that blockchain will merge with the internet into an 'Integrity Web' where systems prove trustworthiness rather than asking for it. The book deliberately uses 'blockchain' as a mass noun to position the technology as an inevitable substrate rather than a countable set of products.
Key Facts
Author Takes
Blockchain's future inevitability
Ben-Sasson's claim that blockchain mass adoption is 'inevitable' might be overstated, but the optimism is welcome and sorely needed given today's more-chastened crypto sentiment.
Crypto brand vs blockchain brand
Preferring 'blockchain' over 'crypto' is a smart PR move given the latter has been tainted by speculations, grifts, crashes, and frauds.
Contrarian Angle
Blockchain as Mass Noun = Inevitable Infrastructure
Ben-Sasson and Jeffay deliberately use 'blockchain' (not 'blockchains') as a mass noun to shift perception from a countable tech product to an inevitable societal substrate, arguing this framing change is key to mainstream adoption.
Most crypto advocates focus on specific chains and tokens; Ben-Sasson argues the movement fails because it focuses too much on 'how' and not enough on 'why,' and reframes blockchain as pervasive infrastructure rather than a product category.
More from The Breakdown
πͺ The onchain gacha machine
Blockworks writer Byron Gilliam explores Collector Crypt, an onchain gacha platform where users spend USDC to open randomized PokΓ©mon card packs, with
πͺ The new math of new news
A new study titled 'The Inefficient Pricing of News' finds that markets are surprisingly slow to incorporate news into stock prices, with an LLM-based
πͺ Thursday Links
This Blockworks newsletter covers four topics: academic research on sanction-evasion MEV in stablecoin enforcement, a critique of Strategy's STRC pref